The Possibility of Emergency Powers Being Invoked and Mounting Tensions
Emergency Powers: US presidents have hundreds of statutory powers that become available upon declaring a national emergency under the NEA. Legal experts and people who have common sense have raised concerns about the broad, unchecked nature of some of these powers and the possibility of their being used to advance domestic policy goals, reinforce extremist agendas or circumvent Congress.
Rising Tensions: Reports indicate heightened political tensions and increased public discourse surrounding issues of immigration, law enforcement and civil liberties; leading to personal anxiety, public demonstrations and civil unrest. The resulting hollow and ineffective political rhetoric on restoring "law and order" is often tied to these tensions.
Conclusion: The discussion around invoking emergency powers is very active among independent political commentators and legal scholars. A reasoned argument can be made that current domestic troop deployments and persuasion rhetoric point toward a willingness to use or expand these powers.
ICE Agents, Convicted Criminals, and White Supremacists
Current Context: There have been specific, documented incidents and reports regarding individuals within ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and other federal agencies having ties to extremist ideologies or engaging in misconduct. In addition, the bureau of labor statistics has documented that ICE has accepted candidates for training with an IQ below 70 (legally intellectually-disabled). The ICE hiring disqualification rate is so low it is almost non-existent. Following their entry into training, some recruits were discovered to have pending criminal charges (including domestic violence and robbery), failed drug tests or not submitted to fingerprinting, failed to meet physical fitness standards (over a third of recruits in one report couldn't pass basic fitness tests) or meet even the most basic academic requirements.
Specific Allegations: News reports and congressional inquiries have highlighted instances, including one involving a high-level ICE prosecutor linked to a racist social media account and another regarding an agent displaying a white supremacist symbol.
A substantial number of ICE Agents are un-employable otherwise: reports from late 2025 indicate a significant lack of robust vetting in the ICE hiring process, stemming from a rushed effort to meet aggressive recruitment targets. This push has resulted in some recruits entering training before completing essential background checks, drug tests, or physical fitness requirements, raising substantial public safety concerns.
Lack of Official Response: These incidents should prompt calls for internal investigations, policy changes regarding vetting, as well as condemnation from critics; but those calls have been nonexistent. These issues fuel a broader, ongoing debate about accountability and extremism within law enforcement agencies.
Conclusion: The claims are rooted in reported incidents involving individuals within the agency. These reports and recorded observations point to a persistent and serious issue of extremism and vetting that has been raised by local communities, watchdog groups and lawmakers.
US Army's Domestic Involvement and Suspending the 2026 Mid-Term Elections
Current Context: This is one of the most serious and highly publicized concerns being debated by political analysts, legal scholars, and opposition leaders.
Domestic Deployment: President Trump has utilized and expanded the deployment of the federally controlled National Guard for domestic operations, particularly for immigration enforcement and supposedly to address "crime", over the objections of many state governors.
The Insurrection Act: Experts worry that the use of the Insurrection Act, which legally allows the military to act as police on US soil, could be further invoked, potentially leading to the presence of federalized troops in states or localities around the time of the 2026 mid-term elections.
Election Suspension: The Constitution and federal law establish that states, not the president, run and certify elections. The power to suspend a federal election is not legally held by the President. However, critics fear that military presence, federal intervention in the voting process, or declarations of an emergency could be used to disrupt or delegitimize election outcomes.
Conclusion: While a complete, formal suspension of elections by the President is widely considered by mainstream analysts and pundits as legally impossible, keep in mind the very same analysts have a staggeringly poor rate of correctly predicting political events since the mid 20-teens. The fact remains, that legitimate concerns stem from the current administration's deployment of military assets domestically and its willingness to challenge electoral processes, leading to speculation about potential local-election interference or efforts to undermine the results.
BRICS Nations Dumping the Dollar and a Financial Collapse
BRICS Goal: The primary, stated goal of BRICS is not to actually cause a collapse, but to achieve greater financial autonomy and reduce their vulnerability to US sanctions and monetary policy. They are working on alternative payment systems and increasing trade settled in local currencies.
Long-Term Trend: The dollar's share of global reserves has slowly declined over the past few decades as other economies (like China, Russia and the Eurozone) have grown. BRICS efforts are expected to continue this trend toward a multipolar global financial system where the dollar holds a smaller share of the market.
Conclusion: The BRICS nations are making concrete moves to de-dollarize trade, which is viewed by most corporate economists as a gradual, long-term shift toward a multipolar currency system. However, independent economists see this as an imminent and potentially catastrophic collapse of the US dollar.
Skip Pulley
Comments
Post a Comment